» » Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords

eBook Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords epub

by David Robertson

eBook Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords epub
  • ISBN: 0198274424
  • Author: David Robertson
  • Genre: Other
  • Subcategory: Social Sciences
  • Language: English
  • Publisher: Clarendon Press; 1 edition (December 10, 1998)
  • Pages: 440 pages
  • ePUB size: 1292 kb
  • FB2 size 1826 kb
  • Formats mbr rtf txt lrf


Home Browse Books Book details, Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords. One chapter applies the statistical techniques Americans call 'jurimetrics' and have successfully used on the US Supreme Court.

Home Browse Books Book details, Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords. Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords. The main theme is that the Law Lords enjoy and fully utilise far more discretion in their judgements than is normally admitted, and that much depends on exactly which judges happen to hear a case.

Start by marking Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords as Want to Read . This book concentrates on the arguments the Lords use in justifying their decisions, and is concerned as much with the legal methodology as with the substance of their decisions

Start by marking Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords as Want to Read: Want to Read savin. ant to Read. This book concentrates on the arguments the Lords use in justifying their decisions, and is concerned as much with the legal methodology as with the substance of their decisions. Although close attention is paid to the different approaches and styles of judicial argument, the book is not restricted to this traditional analytic approach. One chapter applies the statistical This book concentrates on the arguments the Lords use in justifying their decisions, and is concerned as much with the legal methodology as with the substance of their decisions.

There have been few studies of the Law Lords, and no study of them by a political scientist for more than ten years

There have been few studies of the Law Lords, and no study of them by a political scientist for more than ten years. This book concentrates on the arguments the Law Lords use in justifying their decisions, and is concerned as much with the legal methodology as with the substance of their decisions. Very close attention is paid to the different approaches and styles of judicial argument, but the book is not restricted to this traditional analytic approach

This book concentrates on the arguments the Law Lords use in justifying their decisions, and is concerned as much with .

This book concentrates on the arguments the Law Lords use in justifying their decisions, and is concerned as much with the legal methodology as with the substance of their decisions. as Welfare Management 10: Conclusion - Legal Argument and Politics Index.

Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords, by DAVID ROBERTSON. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xiv, 402, (Appendix) 3 and (Index) 11 pp. Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views. Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.

This article lists by year the cases heard before the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords until it was replaced by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in October 2009. The House of Lords was the only body capable of hearing appeals from some courts of the United Kingdom; for instance, in England and Wales, it heard appeals from the Court of Appeal, and could in some circumstances hear appeals directly from the High Court of Justice. DPP v Beard AC 479, 14 Cr App Rep 159.

The House of Lords has served as the highest court in the UK for over 130 years. Indeterminacy in legislation not only allows for executive discretion but also encourages litigation

The House of Lords has served as the highest court in the UK for over 130 years. Indeterminacy in legislation not only allows for executive discretion but also encourages litigation. Parliament has therefore provided the cause of action, and judges are not being ‘activist’. This argument revitalises, with nuance, the legal model of judicial behaviour.

Judicial discretion is the power of the judiciary to make some legal decisions according to their . The judges aptly referred to the words of Lord Camden in 1680

Judicial discretion is the power of the judiciary to make some legal decisions according to their discretion. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the ability of judges to exercise discretion is an aspect of judicial independence. These separations of power rules vest some discretion in the judicial branches, which means that judges are guaranteed to be able to exercise discretion by the US Constitution. Judges can use this discretion to decide cases, and to make common law (also called case law) rules where no existing rule applies. The judges aptly referred to the words of Lord Camden in 1680. The discretion of a judge is the law of tyrants; it is always unknown.

House of Lords Judgments: archive. Darker (Personal Representative of David Stanley Docker (Deceased) and Others (. (Formerly Head and Others (. This page lists HTML versions of all House of Lords judgments delivered from 14 November 1996 to 30 July 2009. s/judgments/ Darker (Personal Representative of David Stanley Docker (Deceased) and Others (. ) v. Chief Constable of The West Midlands Police.

Judicial functions of the House of Lords. The House of Lords of the United Kingdom, in addition to having a legislative function, historically also had a judicial function. In the latter case the House's jurisdiction was essentially limited to the hearing of appeals from the lower courts

This book concentrates on the arguments the Lords use in justifying their decisions, and is concerned as much with the legal methodology as with the substance of their decisions. Although close attention is paid to the different approaches and styles of judicial argument, the book is not restricted to this traditional analytic approach. One chapter applies the statistical techniques Americans call "jurimetrics" and have successfully used on the US Supreme Court.
eBooks Related to Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords
Contacts | Privacy Policy | DMCA
All rights reserved.
lycee-pablo-picasso.fr © 2016-2020