» » History: Fiction Or Science? (Chronology)

eBook History: Fiction Or Science? (Chronology) epub

by Anatoly T. Fomenko

eBook History: Fiction Or Science? (Chronology) epub
  • ISBN: 2913621015
  • Author: Anatoly T. Fomenko
  • Genre: Religion
  • Subcategory: Occult & Paranormal
  • Language: English
  • Publisher: Mithec (September 30, 2003)
  • Pages: 586 pages
  • ePUB size: 1178 kb
  • FB2 size 1953 kb
  • Formats lrf mbr txt doc


Series of books "History - Fiction or Science". Volume 4. Book 1. NEW CHRONOLOGY OF RUSSIA (Contents, Foreword, Abstract) - . Nosovskiy Book 2. THE MIRACLE OF RUSSIAN HISTORY (Contents, Foreword, Abstract) - .

Series of books "History - Fiction or Science". The seven-volume is divided into14 books: Volume 1. NUMBERS AGAINST LIES (Contents, Foreword, Abstract) - . Volume 5. EMPIRE (Contents, Foreword, Abstract) - . Book 2. HEYDAY OF THE TSARDOM (Contents, Foreword, Abstract) - .

Chronology 1. by. Anatoly Fomenko. Book from the collections of. unknown library. Not since the release of the first volume in seven of History Fiction or Science? series. In Chapter I readers are reminded of when the contemporary chronological scale was created, who created it, and that it had major critics. The Biblical Jerusalem is identified with the mediaeval Constantinople. The New Testament was written before the Old, both exposed as referring to mediaeval events.

Anatoly Fomenko, History: Fiction or Science? .

Anatoly Fomenko, History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology 1. In 2004 at the Moscow International Book Fair, Anatoly Fomenko with his coauthor Gleb Nosovsky were awarded for their books on "New Chronology" the anti-prize called "Abzatz" (literally 'paragraph', a Russian slang word meaning 'disaster' or 'fiasco') in the category "Pochotnaya bezgramota" (the term is a pun upon "Pochotnaya gramota" (Certificate of Honor) and may be translated either. Certificate of Dishonor" or literally, "Respectable Illiteracy" ) for the worst book published in Russia.

Fiction or Science?& is the most explosive tractate on history and chronology ever written. This book is not another conspiracy theory - every hypothesis it contains is backed by solid scientific data. The book is well-illustrated, contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays.

Anatoly T. Fomenko was born in 1945. He is a full member (Academician) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences and the International Higher Education Academy of Sciences, as well as a doctor of physics and mathematics, a professor, and head of the Moscow State University Department of Mathematics and Mechanics.

The New Chronology also contains a reconstruction, an alternative chronology, radically shorter than the standard . It is not really known to which extent readers of New Chronology texts regard it as history or fiction. Nor are there reliable statistics on who the readers ar.

The New Chronology also contains a reconstruction, an alternative chronology, radically shorter than the standard historical timeline, because all ancient history is "folded" onto the Middle Ages.

Not since the release of the first volume in seven of "History: Fiction or Science?" series. Jesus Christ was born in 1153 AD and crucified in 1186 AD. Unbelievable? Not since the release of the first volume in seven of "History: Fiction or Science?" series.

What Fomenko is saying is that human history only stretches back to around 1000 C. Femenko make good arguments in bringing back to mind that the present history timeline is based on a chronology done by Scaliger in 1560.

What Fomenko is saying is that human history only stretches back to around 1000 CE. Most of what we call ancient history (before 1000) is a modern invention.

Comments: (7)
Gnng
Very dense. You really have to know your stuff to get through this book. Honestly, if you can read this book and understand it from a math standpoint, well then you are set. History knowledge is no good for this book. Fomenko's whole theory is based on astronomy, the movement of the moon, gravitational forces, gravitational pulls, etc.. Fomenko uses mathematics to explain inconsistencies! So if you know at least something about math and science, enough to understand the fundamental workings of space, well then this book is for you. It is not really for "history buffs" since they are the first to cry malarky! presumably, because they don't get the science behind it. It is not a dig, that's just not the field they are in. Besides, imagine spending your life learning history just to be told you are wrong - doesn't sit well with some people. The book is supposed to be thought provoking. Fomenko is not claiming he is right in any way, he is presenting patterns and inconsistencies in history that he started studying after trying to compute coefficient D in the theory of Lunar Motion when he was studying celestial mechanics. He needed the dates of ancient eclipses, for which he used historical documents to figure out. He found a leap in the interval of the 5th to 10th century. That is how the chronicles begin. The guy wrote 7 books about the subject and spent decades researching the topics. There is so much information in this book, that it might take the smartest person years to dig through. So again, if you have an open mind and want to look at history through the math/science lens, then this book is definitely for you!
Gio
Very dense. You really have to know your stuff to get through this book. Honestly, if you can read this book and understand it from a math standpoint, well then you are set. History knowledge is no good for this book. Fomenko's whole theory is based on astronomy, the movement of the moon, gravitational forces, gravitational pulls, etc.. Fomenko uses mathematics to explain inconsistencies! So if you know at least something about math and science, enough to understand the fundamental workings of space, well then this book is for you. It is not really for "history buffs" since they are the first to cry malarky! presumably, because they don't get the science behind it. It is not a dig, that's just not the field they are in. Besides, imagine spending your life learning history just to be told you are wrong - doesn't sit well with some people. The book is supposed to be thought provoking. Fomenko is not claiming he is right in any way, he is presenting patterns and inconsistencies in history that he started studying after trying to compute coefficient D in the theory of Lunar Motion when he was studying celestial mechanics. He needed the dates of ancient eclipses, for which he used historical documents to figure out. He found a leap in the interval of the 5th to 10th century. That is how the chronicles begin. The guy wrote 7 books about the subject and spent decades researching the topics, so I am sorry, but to disprove his claims, you also have to approach it from a math/ science standpoint. There is so much information in this book, that it might take the smartest person years to dig through. So again, if you have an open mind and want to look at history through the math/science lens, then this book is definitely for you!
Iaiastta
Reviews have been written. This post details my impressions after reading Volumes I and II.

Fomenko's research does not in fact provide a new understanding of history for me, a new veil to adopt as reality. Rather, it pulls aside the old veil of "established" history and leaves a breathtaking open field. In that openness, with the veil which has heretofore served as reality, ripped aside, there are questions begging for answers. What DID happen before the XVI-XIX centuries (possibly - and I hope - to be answered in other of his texts, such as that regarding Russian Tartary or the problems of Chronology)?

A more fundamental question to be answered is, if we have been so easily duped by numbers - in this case, dates - what else are we being duped about? What is the next veil to be pulled aside? What is the nature of time? Einstein is quoted, "... us physicists believe the separation between past, present, and future is only an illusion, although a convincing one."

Fomenko's work provides answers that lead to more questions. The journey is stimulating. Enlightening, too, but as we move, as it were, we pass under one streetlight into the night. What is the next streetlight that will show the ground beneath our feet and hasten us further on our journey?

Since we're talking here about chronology, my mind turns to the mythical "Chronos," which may represent the reality of time as we experience it, the fourth dimension. Meanwhile, perhaps "Kronus" is the counterfeit, the falsification. Fomenko points toward the reality and exposes the falsification. Perhaps the "real" cannot be expressed in words; however, the false can be identified and exposed, thus furthering the quest. I welcome any such furtherance.
Whiteflame
I'll do a more complete review later as i'm still working through the volumes that have been translated into English. Clif High is a recent posting at Half Past Human .com using the tools of predictive linguistics that he has developed over the past decades said that all the great religions will implode over the next decade. I suspect he thinks that the new Russian inter-disciplinary criticism as exemplified by Fomenko and his colleagues will be a major factor in over-throwing the system of lies and mind control the elites have used to enslave humanity. It seems that there are no extant records from the past earlier than the X century A.D. and that entire Classical Age is actually events from the Medieval period that were transposed to a thousand or more years earlier to an age that only exists in works that were created during the Italian renaissance and later. I am presently immersed in this wild ride and highly recommend these works for your immense delectation...
eBooks Related to History: Fiction Or Science? (Chronology)
Contacts | Privacy Policy | DMCA
All rights reserved.
lycee-pablo-picasso.fr © 2016-2020